★ Head-to-head
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 4 Argon: API Cost Comparison
OpenAI's mid-tier workhorse against Google's new flagship while Argon's introductory pricing lasts.
- Runs in your browser
- No signup
- Updated 7 Nov 2026
| Side by side | GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI | Gemini 4 Argon Google |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $2 | $2 |
| Output / 1M | $10 | $10 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Batch discount | 50% off | 50% off |
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Long-prompt surcharge | Above 272K input | None |
| Tier | Mid-tier | Frontier |
Workload
Repeated system prompt or docs
Jobs that can wait hours
Models
$ per 1M tokens, input / output
Monthly cost · 30 days
- Cheapest
- $2,100
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- Priciest
- $2,100
- Gemini 4 Argon
- Spread
- 1.0×
- priciest vs cheapest
| Per 1K users / mo | |||
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-6.1 Sol | $0.00700 | $2,100 | $1,050 |
Gemini 4 ArgonIntro price | $0.00700 | $2,100 | $1,050 |
Where the money is
Caching half your input on Gemini 4 Argon (a shared system prompt or document) would cut about $570/month.
You're looking at ~$2,100/month.
Most AI products I audit can cut that 30–60% with routing, caching and shorter prompts.
Cost at three traffic levels
Same request on both: 2,000 input tokens and 300 output tokens, no caching, no batch, 30-day month.
| Requests / day | GPT-6.1 Sol | Gemini 4 Argon | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $210 | $210 | $0 |
| 10,000 | $2,100 | $2,100 | $0 |
| 100,000 | $21,000 | $21,000 | $0 |
By request type:
| Per 1K calls | GPT-6.1 Sol | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Classification or routing call | $0.9000 | $0.9000 |
| Support chat reply | $5.50 | $5.50 |
| RAG answer over your docs | $16.00 | $16.00 |
| Long document summary | $90.00 | $90.00 |
When to pick which
- Input tokens cost the same on both ($2 per 1M).
- Output tokens cost the same on both ($10 per 1M).
- Cache reads cost the same on both ($0.10 per 1M).
- Both offer 50% off for batch processing.
- GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.05M tokens vs 1.05M tokens).
- GPT-6.1 Sol bills the whole request at a higher rate once input passes 272,000 tokens.
- Gemini 4 Argon's prices here are introductory until 30 Nov 2026; after that, input is $4 and output $20 per 1M.
GPT-6.1 Sol: General-purpose production workloads: chat, tools and RAG at a mid-tier price with cheap cache reads.
Gemini 4 Argon: Google's newest flagship. Large-context multimodal work, at an introductory price until the end of November 2026.
Verdict
It's a wash on price
On list price they are a wash for a typical request. Decide on quality for your task, latency, and which caching model fits your prompts. Then run both on 50 of your real prompts and compare answers and billed tokens side by side.
How the math works
Every provider bills input tokens (your prompt, system prompt and retrieved documents) and output tokens (the reply) separately, per million. Output is usually 4–5× the input price, so chatty apps are output-heavy and RAG apps are input-heavy.
Two adjustments are applied automatically. Introductory prices (currently on some Gemini models) are used until their end date. Long-prompt surcharges kick in when your average input crosses the provider's threshold: 272K tokens on current OpenAI models, 100K on Claude Haiku 5.5.
Not modelled: cache-write premiums, priority or fast tiers, regional surcharges, image and audio tokens, and reasoning tokens a model spends before answering (they bill as output, so add them to your output estimate if you use extended thinking).
Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Gemini 4 Argon?
Can I use both GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon?
How often do OpenAI and Google change prices?
Sources
All prices are list prices from each provider's own documentation, standard tier, in USD, last verified on 7 Nov 2026. Providers change prices often; if a number here disagrees with the source, the source wins.
- GPT-6.1 Soldevelopers.openai.com
- Gemini 4 Argonai.google.dev
More from the workbench
Fine print
Tools: on the house.
Engineer: by the hour.
Knowing your AI bill was free. Cutting it in half isn't, but I'm cheaper than the overspend.
I'm Himanshu, an AI and full-stack engineer. I build MVPs, AI agents and the growth plumbing around them for early-stage startups.
