★ Head-to-head
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol: API Cost Comparison
The two default mid-tier models most teams shortlist for production chat, RAG and tool use. Their list prices are identical, so caching and output length decide the bill.
- Runs in your browser
- No signup
- Updated 7 Nov 2026
| Side by side | Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic | GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $2 | $2 |
| Output / 1M | $10 | $10 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Batch discount | 50% off | 50% off |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Long-prompt surcharge | None | Above 272K input |
| Tier | Mid-tier | Mid-tier |
Workload
Repeated system prompt or docs
Jobs that can wait hours
Models
$ per 1M tokens, input / output
Monthly cost · 30 days
- Cheapest
- $2,100
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Priciest
- $2,100
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- Spread
- 1.0×
- priciest vs cheapest
| Per 1K users / mo | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00700 | $2,100 | $1,050 |
GPT-6.1 Sol | $0.00700 | $2,100 | $1,050 |
Where the money is
Caching half your input on GPT-6.1 Sol (a shared system prompt or document) would cut about $570/month.
You're looking at ~$2,100/month.
Most AI products I audit can cut that 30–60% with routing, caching and shorter prompts.
Cost at three traffic levels
Same request on both: 2,000 input tokens and 300 output tokens, no caching, no batch, 30-day month.
| Requests / day | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $210 | $210 | $0 |
| 10,000 | $2,100 | $2,100 | $0 |
| 100,000 | $21,000 | $21,000 | $0 |
By request type:
| Per 1K calls | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Classification or routing call | $0.9000 | $0.9000 |
| Support chat reply | $5.50 | $5.50 |
| RAG answer over your docs | $16.00 | $16.00 |
| Long document summary | $90.00 | $90.00 |
When to pick which
- Input tokens cost the same on both ($2 per 1M).
- Output tokens cost the same on both ($10 per 1M).
- Cache reads cost the same on both ($0.10 per 1M).
- Both offer 50% off for batch processing.
- GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.05M tokens vs 1M tokens).
- GPT-6.1 Sol bills the whole request at a higher rate once input passes 272,000 tokens.
Claude Sonnet 5.5: The default for production chat, RAG and coding assistants: strong quality at a mid-tier price.
GPT-6.1 Sol: General-purpose production workloads: chat, tools and RAG at a mid-tier price with cheap cache reads.
Verdict
It's a wash on price
On list price they are a wash for a typical request. Decide on quality for your task, latency, and which caching model fits your prompts. Then run both on 50 of your real prompts and compare answers and billed tokens side by side.
How the math works
Every provider bills input tokens (your prompt, system prompt and retrieved documents) and output tokens (the reply) separately, per million. Output is usually 4–5× the input price, so chatty apps are output-heavy and RAG apps are input-heavy.
Two adjustments are applied automatically. Introductory prices (currently on some Gemini models) are used until their end date. Long-prompt surcharges kick in when your average input crosses the provider's threshold: 272K tokens on current OpenAI models, 100K on Claude Haiku 5.5.
Not modelled: cache-write premiums, priority or fast tiers, regional surcharges, image and audio tokens, and reasoning tokens a model spends before answering (they bill as output, so add them to your output estimate if you use extended thinking).
Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
Can I use both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol?
How often do Anthropic and OpenAI change prices?
Sources
All prices are list prices from each provider's own documentation, standard tier, in USD, last verified on 7 Nov 2026. Providers change prices often; if a number here disagrees with the source, the source wins.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5platform.claude.com
- GPT-6.1 Soldevelopers.openai.com
More from the workbench
Fine print
Tools: on the house.
Engineer: by the hour.
Knowing your AI bill was free. Cutting it in half isn't, but I'm cheaper than the overspend.
I'm Himanshu, an AI and full-stack engineer. I build MVPs, AI agents and the growth plumbing around them for early-stage startups.
